Wrong Number

Full disclosure. I’m an election officer. I’ve been one for a couple of years. And I’m pissed.

It’s not the 15 hour shifts. It’s not the voters. It’s the confusion over where voters vote early and where voters vote on Election Day. Voting shouldn’t be a game of whack-a-mole.

Let me back up. The county I serve has more than 64,000 registered voters. In the recent primary election, about 2,000 voted early.

On Election Day, officers report for service at 5:00am. We take an oath. We spend an hour setting up the electronic poll books and ballot machines. And then we open the doors at 6:00am. Voters begin immediately — and then all hell breaks loose. People are showing up at the wrong place.

A little background. My county is in a state that uses a central location for early voting. On Election Day, voters are supposed to go to their home precincts. The problem? Most voters don’t know this. Voter check-in becomes chaotic. Voices are raised. This is the refrain we hear over and over:

“But I always vote here.”

“Yes,” we say, “for early voting. Today is Election Day and you have to go…” Some aggravated voters don’t bother to wait for the end of the sentence. One voter held up her hand and said, “Don’t tell me, I’m Harvard.” Other voters say, “but my mother just voted here last week” or “but I just came from where you want me to go, and I can’t go back now because I’m on my way to work.” Still others claim that the official state election department website gave the central county address.

I took the bait and pulled up the state department of elections on my iPhone. After a few clicks to identify the location I was asking about, I got my answer. It gave me the address of the central county election office — exactly where I was standing. Nothing about my home precinct. The state’s own website couldn’t tell me where I was supposed to go. It merely confirmed where I was.

By noon of primary Election Day, 350 people had shown up at the central election office. All but 60 were turned away. Only 60 votes were cast.

Three hundred and fifty. Sixty. Those are the wrong numbers. We will never know if the voters we turned away would actually make it back to their home precincts.

They’re busy. They tried. Why bother?

It doesn’t have to be this way. It shouldn’t.

Primary elections decide who appears on the November ballot. A small percentage of voters ends up deciding who everyone else gets to choose from. Nationally, primary turnouts run just over 20 percent. General election turnout ranges from 56 to 68 percent depending on who’s running and who’s made the case for voting.

This isn’t just happening in my county. Dallas County had let any voter cast a ballot at any polling site since 2019. Then, this March, the county Republican Party forced a reversion to precinct-only voting for a single primary. The result: 12,674 voters showed up at the wrong location. Election officials sent text alerts, mailers, and ad campaigns warning voters in advance. None of it mattered. Two weeks later, the same party reversed itself and went back to countywide voting for the runoff.

Research bears this out. Polling place and precinct changes reliably suppress voter turnout. One analysis of pandemic-era precinct consolidation in California found the turnout gap widened most for Black and Latino voters, by as much as 3 to 4.4 percentage points. This isn’t randomly distributed confusion. It lands on the same people, every time.

Some states have already found a fix.

Twenty-one states plus the District of Columbia allow “Election Day Vote Centers.” Any registered voter in the county can cast a ballot at any polling site, not just the one tied to their home address.

But twenty-nine states don’t. These restrictions are self-inflicted wounds on American voting. Some of these restrictions are deliberate. Some states encourage the confusion. We know this because at least 41 states have considered more than 300 restrictive voting bills this year. They read like checklists for making voting harder: requiring new proof-of-citizenship documents to register, removing student IDs and debit cards from lists of accepted identification, shortening the time to correct provisional ballots. The details vary. Intentional or not, votes are suppressed.

In some southern states, poll sites are moved without warning. Precinct officials might tape a notice on the door of a closed polling place. The notice says “closed.” The burden of finding the new polling place falls entirely on the voter. In Mississippi, ten precincts moved and ninety more were listed at the wrong address on the state’s election website. A 2025 law now bars officials from moving polling places within 60 days of an election — unless they cite “exigent circumstances.” Mississippi doesn’t define the term “exigent circumstances.” Why bother?

The current administration couldn’t ask for better voter suppression. All of this happens without White House Executive Orders or Supreme Court shadow docket rulings. It all happens without anyone having to issue any order at all.

Systemic malfunction suppresses votes better than any executive order could. No one signs anything. No one breaks the law.

Self-inflicted voter suppression is a bureaucratic failure. What’s coming isn’t. Legislators and civic leaders are already war-gaming a democracy where fake fraud videos flood social media, election workers face death threats, and armed men show up at the polls.

Not all states fall into deliberate voter suppression. While more than half the country locks Election Day into the old precinct model, successful alternatives are up and running. Colorado abandoned the old assigned-precinct model in 2013. Any voter can vote at any polling place in the county. There is no wrong location, because there is no location to get wrong. Arizona has run vote centers since 2018. Lawmakers are still trying to force the state back to precincts — Governor Katie Hobbs has vetoed one attempt, and a ballot measure to kill vote centers statewide may go before voters this November. California is letting counties opt in one at a time. Thirty of its 58 counties have done so. Arkansas runs both systems at once — voting center and precinct voting — proof that the two are not mutually exclusive. None of this requires new technology. The same electronic poll books that track who has voted and where they voted make double voting exceedingly difficult. Twenty-one states and the District of Columbia are proof.

The “wrong number” isn’t a technological problem. It’s a political will problem. The technology exists. The system works. What’s missing is the will to use it. Did your election site lock you out on primary Election Day? I’d be pissed.

These are some of the Courtside Warriors holding the line on authoritarianism— fighting to save democracy—and winning. Sign up for their newsletters. Support them if you can. They are joined by Attorneys General in 24 states who have won more than 80% of their cases against the authoritarian regime.

Democracy Forward, Public Citizen, Protect Democracy, Democracy Docket, League of Women Voters, Campaign Legal Center, ACLU, NAACP Legal Defense Fund, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, Democracy Defenders Fund, Brennan Center for Justice, Common Cause There are many more.

The Courts—Especially the Supreme Court—Won’t Save Us.
Nevertheless, we’ve got to support our Courtside Warriors any way we can.
Just Security Litigation Tracker
On January 29, 2025 there were 24 legal challenges
to Trump Administration actions.
As of August 12, 2026, there are now 930…and counting.